• The Copywriter

  • Recent Posts



  • Recent Comments

    • Taylor: Couldn’t agree more. I am actually doing a project for my Writing class on how male steriotypes effect...
    • A Random Vegan: Not all vegans associate with PETA. I sure as shit don’t. And while you may think all vegans...
    • Kyle McFarlin: Walter, This is one of those ‘you killed it’ posts I hope everyone including me follows....
    • mark: If this guy really has expertise then shooting questions at him over a recorded phone call will probably start...
    • Walter: Didn’t even come close to making it right, Kyle. Sadly, our favorite coffee company is another...
    • Kyle McFarlin: As a HUGE fan of Starbucks and someone who is considering the very card you speak of, I hope they make...
    • Tom Humes: Nice Site layout for your blog. I am looking forward to reading more from you. Tom Humes
    • henrry134: Great place to clarify our doubts with the internet marketers. It sounds great that they are virtually...
    • Kyle McFarlin: Good luck winning the contest. Once you have Infusion, I think you’ll find out about cousins you...
  • Twitter Connect

  • ROI Tip Jar

    Enjoying the content? Then feel free to drop in a couple of bucks and buy me a Starbucks Grande Americano! Click to donate »

  • « Small Businesses - What They Need Most, But Appreciate Least | Home | Marketing Give Me A Mc-Break Today »

    Does The ROI Of Compound User Annoyance Matter?

    Betcher booties it does. Here you are, finalizing your order via a website’s shopping cart. You come to the part ROI Copy streamlines checkout bumps with copy that flowswhere you enter the two letters of your state.  Now, how often do you sigh with annoyance when encountering that drop-down menu and have to scroll through it for your state, when simply typing in the two letter abbreviation would be so much simpler . . . to say nothing of faster?

    Usability expert Jakob Nielsen proves that you’re not alone. He also makes a compelling case that these annoyances have a compounding effect. Ignore it at your peril. Amazon quickly made the corrections. How soon will you?

    Many Annoyances? Disruptive

    Annoyances matter, because they compound. If the offending state-field drop-down were a site’s only usability violation, I’d happily award the site a gold star for great design. But sites invariably have a multitude of other annoyances, each of which delays users, causes small errors, or results in other unpleasant experiences.

    A site that has many user-experience annoyances:

    • appears sloppy and unprofessional,
    • demands more user time to complete tasks than competing sites that are less annoying, and
    • feels somewhat jarring and unpleasant to use, because each annoyance disrupts the user’s flow.

    Even if no single annoyance stops users in their tracks or makes them leave the site, the combined negative impact of the annoyances will make users feel less satisfied. Next time they have business to conduct, users are more likely to go to other sites that make them feel better.

    Source: Does User Annoyance Matter? (Jakob Nielsen’s Alertbox)

    I urge you to read the entire article because the above was just the snippet I clipped. The full article is a fast read, and if your web stats reveal that people are dropping out at a particular phase of your checkout process, the ‘why’ of that is probably in this article.

    Like what you read? Then click here to buy me a coffee.

    By Walter |

    Topics: Marketing Mishaps, Pet Peeves, Pro Analysis |


    To Read More Like This, See . . .

    Comments